One of the fun things about reading archival materials and analysis papers from intelligence agencies and military think tanks is coming across things like this report from the Navy. It’s sad to find such novelty in the notion that there is someone crunching the data who isn’t “fixing the facts around the policy,” but the Navy in particular, in my opinion, is bound to be more honest than many: it’s a lot cheaper and easier to hide the loss of individual soldiers because ideological prediction somehow became policy than it is to smooth over the loss of a multi-billion dollar ship, and as far as much of the budget-driven analysis produced by the Air Force, spare me, please. That’s not analysis–it’s marketing. The Navy, on the other hand, has to live in the real world.
In response to the development of new nuclear weapon systems…and statements by Reagan…suggesting the United States could…win a nuclear war, massive protest movements arose in both Western Europe and the United States. These movements sought an end to… the nuclear arms race. Reflecting this focus, in the United States the campaign emphasized the call for a bilateral “freeze” in nuclear weapons development. It may sound strange to give some credit for ending the Cold War to both Reagan and his most vociferous opponents, but there is good reason to do so. The peace movements of the 1980’s did not succeed in getting their explicit policy demands adopted…However, they did succeed in moderating Western policy. In response to the peace movement’s success in appealing to public opinion..Reagan…ceased all rhetoric suggesting the idea of a winnable nuclear war; instead, President Reagan began speaking regularly about his own concerns regarding the dangers of nuclear weapons. In addition, the United States entered new nuclear arms talks earlier than the Reagan administration had originally intended, and, after talks broke down in fall 1983, the administration worked to ensure talks would resume again as soon as possible.
You mean…Reagan didn’t just ride up on his white horse and smite the Evil Empire to end the Cold War?
Another, even more important strand of grassroots activity was centered in Eastern Europe… The efforts of groups like Solidarity in Poland and Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia paved the way for the revolutions of 1989 that swept away the existing Communist rulers across Eastern Europe. The most decisive events in ending the Cold War…took place on the ground in Eastern Europe. The citizens of these countries who organized and participated in these events have the most obvious, direct links to the crumbling of the Soviet bloc, so their contribution to the end of the Cold War should not be underestimated…Gorbachev’s response to these events was also critically important. In the past, most notably in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968, the Soviet Union had responded to stirrings of independence in its satellites with military intervention. In 1989, Gorbachev made it clear that the Soviet Union would not use its military to assist the Communist governments in these countries in suppressing the opposition movements. This decision had nothing to do, at least directly, with U.S. strength…In fact, many of the ideas and proposals embraced by Gorbachev had their origins in liberal-leaning Western NGOs and research institutes and were transmitted to the Soviet leader through transnational channels rather than through government-to-government communication…(emphasis mine).
So…protests DO work. Activism works. All that marching, protesting, demanding accountability…WORKS. Not only does it work to end unjust policies, it works to encourage just policy. So to all of you working to end the wars, the injustices, and the tide of “friendly fascism” here at home, be of good cheer. It will work. Know that you are doing the right thing, and in a way that will actually accomplish something good,eventually, and in ways you may not anticipate.