Ebola News Round-up for a Fear-Free Weekend

Now that New York City has documented its first case of Ebola, it’s time for Americans to freak out. Okay, I exaggerate. However, I have been completely turned off by the hysteria emanating from the mainstream media looking to increase ratings and elected officials playing politics, knowing there are midterm elections in a few weeks. As we know, politicians and partisans cannot let a good crisis go to waste. I have shunned all cable news these past few weeks. I now prefer to get my information from the cooler heads at NPR (Morning Edition), PBS (The News Hour) and the BBC. Actually, the best source for information about Ebola can be found on the World Health Organization’s web site. (Imagine that!)

This is not to say that people shouldn’t be worried because it is a scary virus and taking precautions, such as washing your hands, is always a good idea. Furthermore, it is obvious from recent events in Dallas, that the United States is ill-prepared to deal with this disease. That should change as experts are called in to educate hospitals and their staff about how to interact with infected patients, dispose of contaminated material and bio-hazard waste, and handle lab specimen properly. Coordinated protocols for health care workers traveling to and from affected regions is a must.

A big part of the fear originates from the lack of trust for those in charge, and some of it is quite warranted. However, fear is overcome by knowledge. You can diminish the anxiety you feel by seeking information from reliable sources, not solely from those whom you align with ideologically – be it on the left or the right. Below are some articles and resources you may find helpful. There will no doubt be more cases of Ebola diagnosed in this country, but you are more likely to be killed by a shark, or by lightning, or in a car crash (that one much more likely), than from Ebola.

 

What’s My Risk of Catching Ebola?

 

There is no better resource about Ebola than the World Health Organization. Information is power. Information reduces fear and anxiety.

Ebola facts from the World Health Organization

FAQs about Ebola

 

Primary focus of response must be to halt spread of Ebola in West Africa – UN

“As the international community mobilizes on all fronts to combat the unfolding Ebola outbreak, the primary emphasis must continue to be on stopping the transmission of the virus within Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, the three hardest-hit countries, United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) experts said today.”

 

Some examples of needless panic:

The Most Ignorant American Ebola Panic of the Moment

 

However, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid. Below is an interesting study that explains the panic.

One Study to Explain Ebola Panic

“The experiment’s takeaway was this: When the perception of risk increases, the feeling of risk increases. This lesson is instructive in thinking about why some pockets of America are overreacting to the threat of Ebola.

To our collective credit, the American people are thinking pretty calmly about the disease’s threat. Just 24 percent of respondents to a recent Gallup Poll said they were worried about contracting Ebola. But for some communities who see themselves as being just a few degrees of separation away from Ebola, the threat has provoked panic. To extend the metaphor from the Michigan experiment, these communities are being sneezed on or are acting out of fear of being sneezed on.”

 

But there is some good news! Congratulations, Nina!

Nina Pham, Dallas Nurse, Declared Free of Ebola and Released From Hospital

 

And more good news!

Seems all it takes for vaccine research and production to kick into overdrive is for Ebola to impact the developed world. Funny how that works…

Millions of doses of experimental Ebola vaccines will be produced by the end of 2015, the World Health Organization has announced

 

Big Pharma’s race to develop an Ebola vaccine

“Are these companies just profiting off misery? As The New York Times pointed out yesterday, testing and scaling up the production of drugs takes real money, and bringing a new vaccine to market can cost as much as $1.5 billion.

This often pays off for Big Pharma, as patented, brand-name drugs can be worth worth billions, For diseases like Ebola, though, it can take a humanitarian disaster to create the necessary urgency to act.

Sure we can be cynical. But to view the success of stocks like Bavarian Nordic and NewLink Genetics as the profits of doom is to ignore the economic realities that go into discovering and administering a real-world cure”.

 

Stephanie Cutter: Ebola vaccine research was cut in half, and more cuts are coming

Perhaps cuts to Ebola research, due to budget cuts for research at the NIH, should never have been made. It appears more cuts are on the horizon, per the sequester…perhaps Congress should reconsider that one.

 

Big data put to good use:

Big data could help: Mobile-phone records would help combat the Ebola epidemic.

“CDRs can therefore tell epidemiologists where people have been, when—and perhaps also where they are headed, based on their past movements. Analysing the records has proved helpful in tracking the spread of diseases on previous occasions.”

 

Why Ebola won’t go airborne

The video in the above link explains it well. I recommend watching it.

(I tried to embed the video, but I couldn’t get it to show up. Sorry.)

 

Now that you know the odds of catching Ebola, have some facts, are aware of the misinformation out there as well as what is being done/can be done to deal with any future cases, and hearing the news that Nina Pham is Ebola-free, chill a little and enjoy an Ebola-fear-free weekend. Peace!

Hot Topic Triumverate

Dear Left-Leaning Friends[i],

It is no secret that our friends on the Right have a reputation for denying science—evolution, climate change, etc.

But let’s not be foolish. There are left-leaning folks out there who also deny science. Or rather, conveniently ignore it, misinterpret it—sometimes on purpose.

Yes. I said it.

Some self-identifying liberals deny certain scientific studies and facts.

The gmowhole GMO debacle is a great example. Lefties tend to be wary of GMOs, while agribusinesses and the Right tend to favor/push GMOs.

Now, I’m not a fan of Monsanto, but Lefties have been presenting very weak scientific data on the supposed harm GMOs do.  We misinterpret studies to prove our point, whatever our point is.  We did the same in Portland, Oregon, a liberal bastion, who voted once again to not fluoridate their water.
flouride

It was an ugly smear campaign, and both sides of this debate are partially to blame.

vaccineWe, on the left, pride ourselves for thinking critically and outside the box, for trying to see the whole picture–but there’s a damn good reason we have vaccines[ii].

I understand concerns about the timing and spacing of vaccines, and believe that parents in consultation with their pediatricians should decide on the best vaccination schedule for their kids, although ideally it should be within the guidelines recommended by health authorities like the WHO and CDC.

But rejecting vaccines altogether? For one thing, you’re endangering your child by exposing her to potentially serious illnesses. Let me put it this way: when parents of a pediatrician friend of mine ask her if their children should get vaccinated, she says: ‘oh, NO! I haven’t had a good case of measles in years! It would bring back such memories!’

Whew. I’ve managed to touch on three molten-lava-hot-topics—what do *you*, dear reader, think about one or any of these issues? Of the misinterpretation of science, of the left and science, of GMOs, vaccines, and/or fluoridation?

I’m genuinely interested in your opinion and thoughts.

Thanks in advance–  trust you all to be civil, etc.,

ContraWhit

 


[i] Would “comrade” be more fitting? 🙂

[ii] Note the vaccination debate falls into the Right as well.